Healing From A Chip Shoulder Bone

The Supreme Court conviction for molesting father

An estranged father, who wanted to see her baby,''guilty of causing disorder in public places.'' Also lives in the apartment the woman's new companion.

Cassation: stick to 'the bell of the former wife harassment.

Rome, May 13 - Hard times for separated fathers. A new ruling by the Supreme Court in fact has sentenced a father for the crime of harassment, because man, just to see her son, had been attacked repeatedly over the intercom of the house of his ex-wife''playing on a continuous basis.'' And for this reason, the judges of Piazza Cavour condemned him under Article 660 of the Criminal Code.

The facts date back to February of 2003 and address a separate set of Florence. Vincent T., 48 years had been at the apartment of his ex-wife Daniela L., where the woman lives with her new companion to''take and take with him the day his son Luke.'' Faced, however, the refusal of the woman,''Vincent had pressed the bell continuously for about five to ten minutes''without obtaining the desired result. And so did the next day, so that the woman had first sought the intervention of the police and then he had denounced. In February two years after the first ruling by the Court Single Judge Florence man who was acquitted of the crime of harassment''because the fact (stick to the intercom, ed) is not required by law as a crime.''

course with his ex-wife's new companion ill have digested the decision of the Court of Florence and have appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking an order for harassing her former husband. Appeal upheld the First Criminal Chamber, noting that the offense punishes harassment''there is much in the place where the agent is in a public place or place open to the public and the taxpayer in a private place, the assumption where the harassment is caused by a private place against anyone who is in a public place or place open to the public.'' No mitigating

was granted to the father than the reason that prompted him to 'stick' the bell, that is the will to take the child. The Supreme Court ruling with 15,026, showed in fact that the act done with conscience''and will''had a single purpose:''to cause disturbance in a public place''means''the use of the telephone, means of communication similar to the phone.''

Therefore, based on this principle, the Supreme Court annulled the acquittal granted to the estranged father, is now providing that the Court of Appeal of Florence ripronunciarsi offense of harassment''conforming to the principle of law stated.''