(Supreme 22500/04)
even when they have an age closer to 40 years to 30. The verdict set aside the decision which the Court of Appeal ruled that an estranged father, was no longer pay the monthly allowance for the maintenance of two daughters, now 34 and 36 years old and had lived with his ex-wife without achieving economic independence.
He believed his daughters "guilty" of not having yet found a job or refusing certain opportunities. The courts of appeal, given the age of the girls had given him reason, excluding that should continue to pay their monthly allowance.
In the opinion of the Court of Appeal, in fact, there is "a limit that must be put on the basis of age, to have the right to maintenance: beyond this limit, the maintenance becomes parasitism.
The Supreme Court is not, however, was of the same opinion and allowed the appeal by ex-wife. In regard to the Supreme Court stated that "the obligation to keep the children does not automatically cease with the coming of age, or beyond a certain limit it, but continues until the moment when the children reach their own economic independence or are guilty for not having put in a position to achieve a qualification or to obtain an income, with a suitable work, or to have unjustifiably refused that activity ".
0 comments:
Post a Comment